[postgis-devel] postgis-1.5.sql
Chris Hodgson
chodgson at refractions.net
Mon Nov 16 14:12:24 PST 2009
Paul, you bring this question up so often it makes me wonder if there
really is a reason...
http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2009-August/006599.html
It all pints back to:
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/94
Where it seems the argument against numbering the .sql was that you'd
have to also number the .so, which you didn't want to do because it
complicated the update process.
Chris
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> What do we think about numbering the SQL file? I think it seems wise, is there a reason to not do it?
>
> P
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list