Long transactions

[Sandro Santilli]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 01:00:16AM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> > How do we feel about removing the “long transaction” code?
> > 
> >   doc/reference_transaction.xml
> >   extras/WFS_locks
> >   postgis/long_xact.sql.in
> >   postgis/uninstall_long_xact.sql.in
> >   regress/core/long_xact.sql
> > 
> > It was originally written in hopes that WFS services might use them so that it
> > would be possible to have shared lock management in the database, but that
> > never actually happened. So it’s been fallow for going on 20 years.
> > 
> > ???
> > 
> > P=
> Sandro and I were discussing this a couple of days ago, that we'll need something like that for topology locking,
> But I think you are probably right given know one has looked at that piece of code in 20 years, would be better to start from scratch
> anyway if we need such a thing.  So I'm okay with you ripping it out.
> 
> Sandro - any thoughts on the matter?

Feel free to remove it, we have a way to dig it back if we need it
for reference.

--strk;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20240422/fec84926/attachment.sig>